Abstract: I  will attempt to explain how position and momentum form a Fourier  transform pair using elementary quantum state equations. Showing this is a Fourier pair entails the uncertainty principle. The implicit math involved is first order ordinary differential equations with a sprinkling of linear algebra.
Introduction:  Position and momentum form a Fourier transform pair. Professor Johnson's  link on Fourier transforms explained how Fourier mappings move a function  from the time domain to its pair in the frequency domain and back. 
Similarly, position and momentum are inverse Fourier transforms mapping from momentum space to position space:
Calculations:
Momentum State (in momentum space):
(I  won't show how to explicitly calculate this, but it essentially  involves using Schrodinger's equation for a defined wave function,  eigenfunction   , and momentum operator
, and momentum operator . We can convert between momentum frequency because quantum mechanical particles have frequencies proportional to their momenta)
. We can convert between momentum frequency because quantum mechanical particles have frequencies proportional to their momenta)
 . We can convert between momentum frequency because quantum mechanical particles have frequencies proportional to their momenta)
. We can convert between momentum frequency because quantum mechanical particles have frequencies proportional to their momenta)Position State (in position space):
Note the negative exponents which indicate that they are a Fourier pair. 
We can Fourier transform between these pairs as follows: 
Adding up all possible momentum states for a particle, we have the wave function in position space:
and adding up all possible position states for a particle we have the wave function in momentum space:
Conclusion: 
The  interdependence between the integrals suggests the Heisenberg  uncertainty principle. Recall that intervals of length I between  successive peaks in a function correspond to intervals or length 1/I in  that function's Fourier inverse. This means that, the higher accuracy we  know either position or momentum (the smaller the I) then the less  accurately we know its Fourier inverse (larger 1/I). That is identically  the uncertainty principle.
Acknowledgments:
I would like to thank Casey Handmer (2010 Ph 12a TA) for first suggesting this during recitation, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform#Uncertainty_principle and  http://quantummechanics.ucsd.edu/ph130a/130_notes/node82.html as well. I'm also indebted to my gradually receding ability to concentrate, and to viewers like you. But not necessarily in that particular order.
For a more interesting explanation of this post: 
 indicate position and
 indicate position and  i
i 
Nice application of the course reading. Don't you love it when topics covered in two different classes come together like that?
ReplyDelete